some say programs such as the UN’s Agenda 2030 have objectives to dramatically reduce world population to more ‘ideal’ levels. Is it plausible Epstein’s research would have supported such objectives?

  • By
  • Posted in Epstein
  • 5 mins read
  • Published

Powered by https://x.com/Thewebb_io

Epstein’s Research and Population Control Objectives: A Plausible Connection

Direct Evidence of Population Control Ideology

The documents reveal explicit and concerning connections between Epstein’s scientific activities and population control ideologies:

  1. Opposition to Feeding the Poor: In a 2011 email to Harvard professor Martin Nowak, Epstein wrote: “I would like someone to run population scenarios… my sense is that if you feed the poor in Africa, you will be creating a very serious problem for the future without new food resources” [, ]. Nowak responded: “I think you are right. Feeding individuals in an exponentially (or faster) growing population is like trying to extinguish fire with oil” [].
  2. Education as Population Control: Nowak suggested that education “would make them reproduce less” and recommended “Joel Cohen at Rockefeller might be an expert on this topic” []. This directly connects Epstein’s network to Rockefeller University’s historical involvement in population control initiatives.
  3. Intelligence and Population Concerns: Epstein wrote to former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers in 2013: “I believe that if you made everyone smarter, too quickly, a subset might realize that there are just too many people for the current resource, and decide a solution. I.e. no reason to believe that consequences would be benign” [].

Transhumanism as Modern Eugenics

Epstein’s transhumanist interests directly align with population control objectives:

  • His vision was described as reflecting “his longstanding fascination with what has become known as transhumanism: the science of improving the human population through technologies like genetic engineering and artificial intelligence” [].
  • Critics have “likened transhumanism to a modern-day version of eugenics, the discredited field of improving the human race through controlled breeding” [].
  • Epstein had an “unusual dream” to “seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his vast New Mexico ranch” – a personal eugenics project [, ].

Institutional Connections to Population Control Networks

Epstein’s affiliations suggest alignment with global governance structures that have historically engaged in population control:

  1. Rockefeller University: Epstein was a “former board member of Rockefeller University” [, ]. The Rockefeller family has a well-documented history of funding population control initiatives globally.
  2. Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations: Epstein was a member of both elite global governance organizations [, ]. These groups have historically influenced global policy, including population discussions.
  3. Global Health Connections: Epstein communicated with Dr. Nathan Wolfe, a Stanford professor working on pandemic prevention who mentioned selling data and services to African presidents to “protect themselves against biological threats” []. This suggests Epstein’s interest in population-level biological interventions.

Scientific Research with Population Implications

Epstein’s Harvard Program for Evolutionary Dynamics (PED) focused on areas with population control applications:

  • Evolutionary Biology: Understanding evolution at the biochemical level to manipulate genetics [].
  • HIV/AIDS Research: Funding Martin Nowak’s work on HIV dynamics, which Epstein noted had caused “36 million deaths” [, ].
  • Biological Threat Assessment: Epstein planned conferences to establish “an NGO to monitor Earth’s greatest threats” including biological risks [].

What the Documents Don’t Show

No Direct Mention of Agenda 2030 or UN Population Goals: The documents contain no explicit references to UN Agenda 2030 or specific UN population reduction targets.

Limited Evidence of Coordinated Global Policy: While Epstein held population control views and had elite connections, the documents don’t show he was part of a coordinated global population reduction agenda.

Scientific Research vs. Policy Implementation: Epstein’s Harvard research was legitimate evolutionary biology, not explicitly eugenic, though his personal motivations appear to have been eugenic.

Assessment: Plausible but Not Proven

Is it plausible Epstein’s research would support dramatic population reduction objectives? Yes, based on:

  1. His Explicit Views: Epstein directly opposed feeding the poor to control population growth [].
  2. His Transhumanist Agenda: He sought to “improve” the human population through genetic engineering [].
  3. His Institutional Connections: Rockefeller University, Trilateral Commission, and CFR have historical ties to population control.
  4. His Scientific Focus: Evolutionary dynamics and pandemic research have population-level implications.

However, the documents don’t show:

  • Direct coordination with UN Agenda 2030
  • Explicit funding of population reduction research
  • Evidence that his Harvard PED conducted eugenic research

The pattern suggests Epstein personally embraced population control ideology and used his scientific philanthropy to position himself within networks that could advance such objectives, but his actual research funding appears to have been for legitimate science that could be intellectually adjacent to population control without being explicitly eugenic.

Most Concerning Finding: Epstein’s email about not feeding the poor in Africa because it would create “a very serious problem for the future” [] reveals a Malthusian worldview that aligns with the most extreme population control ideologies. When combined with his transhumanist breeding fantasies and elite institutional connections, this creates a plausible foundation for supporting dramatic population reduction objectives.

Dig Deeper:

  • “Epstein communicated with Nathan Wolfe about biological threat data for African governments – were there discussions about using pandemics or biological agents for population control purposes?”
  • “Martin Nowak referenced Joel Cohen at Rockefeller University as a population expert – what specific population control research or initiatives did Epstein’s Rockefeller connections involve?”
  • “Epstein’s foundation supported school construction in Haiti while he opposed feeding the poor in Africa – was there a pattern of supporting education over basic survival needs as a population control strategy?”